last updated: 01 June 2009


TI08 Project 0176 Index - PDS

-- S&U 0184 -- Schedule -- RT -- intdev -- Cray -- XT5 -- CrayPort -- Cray Docs -- man(xt) -- ERDC Docs (xt4:jade) -- CUG -- intdev --

  • RT Priorities/Guidelines
  • 2009-01-20: Cray External Services briefing (pdf)
  • 2008-10-24: IATO - Network
  • 2008-10-21: nessus - csa-Pingo - csa-Ognip
  • 2008-08-11: Networks (pdf) (xls)
  • 2008-08-1l: BootRaid (pdf) (xls)
  • /import/support/WO/0176/Baselines (rpm, uals, ...)
  • RPMs removed@AWE (pdf) (doc)

  • 2008-07: UGC Stuff:
    • UGC Cray XT Tutorial Notes (from Tom Logan)
    • Directory materials from John Levesque's tutorial
  • 2008-05: CUG Stuff:
    • Liam's Trip Report
    • 2008 CUG ALPS Tutorial

  • 2008-05-28 XT Logical/Network view -- xls
  • 2008-04-29 XT/CLE Overview -- ppt

  • 2008-09-19 XTS/HW and ARSC XTAAT Classes
    • Trip Report
    • XT Boot LUN Partitions

  • Project Plans:
    • 05/21 Contract
    • 05/25 Facilities
    • 05/25 Training
    • 05/25 Draft other
    • 02/29 All (orig)
  • 2008-11-23 ELT2 Final Summary (pdf, xls)
  • 2008-11-23 ELT2 Final Events (pdf)

  • 2008-10-07 Pingo Packing List (pdf); uuid: pingo and ognip

  • 2008-10-03 ELT1 Final (pdf, xls)
  • 2008-10-03 ELT1 Final Whiteboard (pdf, xls)

  • 2008-08-12 ATP v9.2 (signed)
    • Benchmark READMEs
    • ATP CT1/CT2 xref (pdf) (xls)
    • Cray Ready Email
    • Original CT Dates
    • ATP drafts and comments (directory)
  • 2008-08-01 NAG (for Cray/pingo access in Chippewa Falls)

  • 2008-06-11 Futures "wish list"
  • 2008-05-29 Service Node clarifications
  • 2008-05-19 Proposed layout (under review)

  • Proposal Specifications: Attachments 6-8 (pdf), (xls)

  • 2008-05-28 Parts Lists: (xls), pdf: All - 5Cab - TDS

  • System Diagrams, 5Cab: Layout - MUS - TDS: Layout - MUS

  • XT5 volatility memo (doc); attacmhent (xls)
  • Cray Network Access Agreement
    (training, NDA via UA Intellectual Property Office), (original)
  • CrayPort Access Agreement
Award:
  • 2008-01-28 Cray Response
  • 2008-01-02 GSA Response (includes secondary schedule)
  • 2008-12-09 Cray Response (includes preliminary schedule)
  • 2008-12-07 HPCMO Requests
Related:
Phase2:
  • 09/2007 TI08 Phase II RFQ (pdf)
  • proposal(2) (pdf)
  • FC vs. SATA response (pdf)
  • Revised Diagrams (pdf)
  • diagrams (dir)
  • benchmark data, see: /import/support/WO/0176/ti08/bm2

  • 10/2007 TI08 Phase II RFQ Ammendment 1:
      word, pdf: base - Att.4 - Att.5 - Att.6 - Att.7-10
Phase1:
  • 04/2007 Phase I RFQ (pdf)
  • proposal(1) (pdf)
  • diagrams (tar)
  • July presentation (pdf)
  • Questions reponse #2 (pdf)
  • benchmark data, see: /import/support/WO/0176/ti08/bm1

  • 04/2007 HPCMP TI Index
Phase2 Benchmark Files
  • Benchmark Results (pdf) - (xls)
    Note, 2008-01-02 GSA Response adjusts LAMMPS.
  • IO Requirements (pdf) - (xls)

  • Benchmark Volume (pdf) - (word)

  • Compiler Flags (apps) (pdf) - (xls)
  • Compiler Flags (synth)
  • XT5 Configuration Tables (xls)
  • XT4 Configuration Tables (xls)
Phase2 Benchmark READMEs (ECC == Export Controlled Code)
  • AMR
  • AVUS (ECC?)
  • CTH (ECC?)
  • GAMESS
  • HYCOM
  • ICEPIC (ECC?)
  • LAMMPS
  • OOCORE
  • OVERFLOW (ECC?)
  • WRF
  • MultiMaps
  • Synthetics
  • 04/2008 Technology Panel Overview (pdf), (ppt))
  • 02/2008 Announcement (pdf), (ppt)
  • 05/2007 ARSC Science Panel Overview (ppt)
ognip

pingo installation

A pingo is a mound of earth-covered ice found in the Arctic, subarctic, and Antarctica that can reach up to 70 metres in height and up to 2 kilometres in diameter. The term originated as the Inuit word for a small hill.

Pingos can only form in a permafrost environment. Evidence of collapsed pingos (ognip) in an area suggests that there was once permafrost. Pingos usually grow only a few centimetres per year and the largest take decades or even centuries to form. The process that creates pingos is believed to be closely related to frost heaving.


2008-11 Top-500 (pingo):
  • #108 overall
  • #057 of 289 ranked systems in the US
  • #041 of 93 academic systems worldwide
  • #015 of 33 academic systems in the US
  • #014 of 22 Cray systems on the list
  • #024 of 60 AMD systems on the list